Learning about evaluation with small cohorts (pdf)



The impact evaluation with small cohorts project is designed to help higher education providers overcome methodological and theoretical challenges in evaluating the impact of interventions with small cohorts of participants, where traditional large-scale quantitative evaluation methods are not suitable.

An initial consultation phase revealed that respondents from across the sector face a range of challenges when evaluating small-cohort interventions.

The project advisory team developed guidance on the use of eight evaluation approaches suitable for use in small-cohort contexts.

This guidance was supplemented by hypothetical case studies showing how each methodology might be applied in a higher education (HE) evaluation context.

TASO report: Learning about evaluation with small cohorts

Higher education provider project teams: testing the evaluation methodologies

Six project teams representing different higher education providers (HEPs) tested four evaluation methodologies: Realist Evaluation, Contribution Analysis, Most Significant Change (Transformative Evaluation) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis. The six HEPs and their reports, case studies and Theory of Change documents are listed below.

City College Norwich

Leeds Arts University

Plymouth Marjon University

University Centre Leeds

University of Suffolk

University of Leeds, Lifelong Learning Centre