Mental health can mean different things to different people. For theStudent mental health project, we followed non-clinical understandings of mental health and wellbeing. At its core, this is the understanding that mental health and wellbeing is a spectrum that is not necessarily determined by a medical diagnosis. We refer to ‘mental health’ when referring to a person’s emotional and mental state and ‘wellbeing’ when referring to a broader spectrum of experience, including a person’s physical, social and economic context.
For this reason, we have preferred using terms such as ‘mental health difficulties’ and ‘poor mental health’ and referring to persons experiencing a diagnosis as ‘living with’ a diagnosis. However, there are instances in which clinical references are used for clarity. For example, clinical language may be necessary when referring to ‘serious mental illness’ where the term is commonly used within primary and secondary care services and therefore higher education providers may need to align their terminology with that of external healthcare providers.
See our full glossary of terms below.
Glossary
Term
Definition
Mental Health
TASO defines mental health in accordance with the definition outlined by the World Health Organisation (WHO):
‘Mental health is a state of mental well-being that enables people to cope with the stresses of life, realise their abilities, learn well and work well, and contribute to their community.[…] Mental health is more than the absence of mental disorders. It exists on a complex continuum, which is experienced differently from one person to the next, with varying degrees of difficulty and distress and potentially very different social and clinical outcomes.’ (World Health Organization, 2022)
Wellbeing
We use the definition set by one of our consortium partners, What Works Wellbeing:
‘Wellbeing, put simply, is about ‘how we are doing’ as individuals, communities and as a nation and how sustainable this is for the future.
We define wellbeing as having 10 broad dimensions which have been shown to matter most to people in the UK as identified through a national debate. The dimensions are: the natural environment, personal wellbeing, our relationships, health, what we do, where we live, personal finance, the economy, education and skills and governance.
Personal wellbeing is a particularly important dimension which we define as how satisfied we are with our lives, our sense that what we do in life is worthwhile, our day to day emotional experiences (happiness and anxiety) and our wider mental wellbeing.’ (What Works Wellbeing, n.d.)
It is important to note the difference between wellbeing and mental health. Wellbeing is not simply the absence of mental illness and nor are mental health symptoms necessarily an indicator of poor wellbeing. As UUK’s Stepchange, Mentally Healthy Universities guidance points out, ‘[w]ellbeing includes wider physical, social and economic experience’ (Pury and Dicks, 2021:p.8).
Mental Health Difficulties
TASO’s preferred language is to refer to ‘mental health difficulties’, as opposed to mental health ‘problems’, ‘issues’, ‘struggles’, ‘challenges’, ‘disorders’ or ‘conditions’.
The use of the term ‘difficulties’ in relation to mental health implies barriers to maintaining one’s mental health. As a non-clinical term, it is accessible and holds within its remit both those that have a clinical diagnosis and those that do not.
This approach is more appropriate for this project as it favours everyday language as opposed to medicalised language. It is a term recommended by the British Psychological Society, stipulating that its use is a way of moving away from the ‘disease’ model of mental illness (Division Division of Clinical Psychology Beyond Functional Psychiatric Diagnosis Committee, 2014).
While there are diagnoses in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) that are named ‘disorders’, using it as a broad term in reference to mental health is unhelpful and implies merely abnormality. However, the term ‘disorder’ can be used in reference to specific clinical disorders if it is appropriate to name them such as ‘anxiety disorder’ or ’emotionally unstable personality disorder’.
Alternative Phrasing: ‘Poor mental health’
Mental Distress
In accordance with recommendations by the British Psychological Society, the use of the term ‘mental distress’ is preferred, particularly in cases in which it may not be clear whether a person has received a clinical diagnosis (British Psychological Society, 2022).
This helps to move away from the biomedical model of mental health as it focuses more on the emotional experience of the individual rather than the diagnosis.
Mental Illness
In cases in which there is reasonable cause to specify that a person’s experience of poor mental health is clinically diagnosed, TASO suggests using the term ‘mental illness’. This is in accordance with the definition of terms as outlined by the Student Mental Health Charter.
‘Mental illness will be taken to mean a condition and experience, involving thoughts, feelings, symptoms and/or behaviours, that causes distress and reduces functioning, impacting negatively on an individual’s day to day experience, and which may receive or be eligible to receive a clinical diagnosis’. (Hughes & Spanner, 2019:p.9).
Severe Mental Illness (SMI)
While maintaining a broadly non-clinical approach to discussing mental health, there may be instances where it is important to distinguish between ‘severe mental illness’ and other mental health difficulties.
When referring to mental health difficulties that are enduring, involve a high level of psychological distress and affect a person’s ability to live their day-to-day life for an extended period of time, TASO recommends using the term ‘severe mental illness’. These are often considered but not limited to, difficulties that are on the psychotic spectrum of disorders, personality disorders, eating disorders and trauma-related disorders. It is important to note that depression and anxiety, while being widely experienced by a larger percentage of the population, can still be experienced as complex mental health difficulties.
Within the NHS, severe mental illness (SMI) is a term that is helpful to differentiate experiences of mental illness in order to provide additional psychological and physical therapies and legal support. The NHS sometimes also refers to SMI as ‘serious mental illness’, a term that is also adopted by Student Minds in the Student Mental Health Charter. Though both are acceptable, TASO recommends the use of ‘severe mental illness’ for clarity.
Alternative Phrasing: Alternative phrasing which may be appropriate in non-clinical contexts is ‘complex mental health difficulties’ or ‘complex needs’. Referring to these disorders as ‘complex’ encapsulates the experience that many mental health difficulties can be co-occurring and that the separation of symptoms as outlined by diagnostic practice does not always accurately reflect a person’s emotional experience.
Living with…
TASO will refer to individuals experiencing mental health difficulties as people ‘living with’ a mental health difficulty or clinically diagnosed illness. For example, we encourage saying ‘students living with depression’ rather than ‘depressed students’ or ‘having depression’.
This maintains a neutral person-centred approach that reduces the stigma surrounding mental health. It focuses on the individual rather than defining them by a symptom or illness.
This phrasing also avoids the use of phrases which are not neutral and imply a degree of victimisation such as ‘struggling with’ or ‘suffering from’ a mental health difficulty (Mental Health Foundation, 2022).
Died by suicide
In accordance to guidance outlined by Samaritans, in referring to suicide, TASO will use language that is senstive and non-judgemental. Using ‘died by suicide’, as opposed to ‘committed suicide’, avoids the implication of wrong-doing (Samaritans, n.d.).
Following Samaritans media guidelines, TASO will also avoid references to suicide in dramatic headlines and strong terms such as ‘suicide epidemic’ or ‘crisis’ (Samaritans, 2020).
Alternative Phrasing: Other acceptable phrases include ‘take one’s own life’, ‘suicide attempt’, ‘completed suicide’, ‘person at risk of suicide’.
Recovery
TASO will use the word ‘recovery’ in reference to personal recovery, which is subjective and can mean different things to different people. Under this definition, recovery does not have to necessarily live symptom free. For some people, recovery can mean managing mental health difficulties well in order to build resilience and to live a meaningful life.
This definition of recovery is in line with a more person-centred approach and acknowledges the possible differences in people’s experiences (Rethink Mental Illness, n.d.).
Intervention
TASO recommends the use of ‘intervention’ to denote programmes directly engaging with students in order to support their mental health, wellbeing or longer-term student outcomes (retention, progression, awarding). This involves programmes that have a clear set of goals and strategies that help to improve some aspect of mental health or wellbeing. These can be preventative programmes or more treatment based programmes.
These can include psychological interventions such as counselling, peer support programmes, recreational activities, physical activity, active and passive psychoeducation and settings based programmes, infrastructural and intersystem collaboration programmes. A typology of mental health interventions is provided in the Toolkit.
Prevention and Postvention
Prevention interventions refer to those that work towards raising awareness and promoting good mental health, or work in a targeted way to support those that are considered at risk of their mental health deteriorating.
Postvention interventions refer to interventions that aim to support people who are bereaved following a loved one or member of the community dying by suicide.
These definitions are widely accepted in the mental health sector, though they may not be immediately obvious to those outside of it (Survivors of Bereavement by Suicide, n.d.).
Positive or negative affect
Positive and negative affects refer to the two dimensions of our affective states as set out in Bradburn’s model of wellbeing (1969). An affect refers to an emotional state, expression, trait or a mood. Affective responses with a positive valence such as joy and enthusiasm are considered positive affects, while those with a negative valence such as fear or anxiety are considered negative affects. Many studies, particularly those drawing on positive psychology, refer to positive and negative affect as indicators of general wellbeing.
References
Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being. Oxford: Aldine.
Sampson, K., Priestley, M., Dodd, A. L., Broglia, E., Wykes, T., Robotham, D., Tyrrell, K., Ortega Vega, M. and Byrom, N. C. (2022) ‘Key questions: research priorities for student mental health,’ BJPsych Open. Cambridge University Press, 8(3), e90. DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2022.61
This report examines student mental health in the UK in 2024, with a particular focus on LGBTQ+ students, using survey data collected from thousands of undergraduates.
TASO is working with three universities to participate in a project that will evaluate their student mental health and wellbeing interventions (prompted by analytics).
TASO is working with two universities to participate in a project that will evaluate student mental health and wellbeing interventions they deliver to small cohorts.
Templates for researchers and evaluators writing a range of reports, including for economic evaluation reports, implementation and process reports, analysis reports and final project reports.
The resources on this page provide useful protocol templates for researchers and evaluators. The templates cover protocols for trials, qualitative research, implementation and process evaluation, rapid evidence and economic evaluation.
This project explored how education providers can improve labour market outcomes for graduates from disadvantaged groups and address gaps in the participation in sandwich courses.
These resources were developed as part of the ‘Multi-intervention outreach and mentoring’ project. We explored the different ways that multi-intervention outreach and monitoring programmes could be evaluated.
These resources were developed as part of the summer school evaluation project, looking at the link between summer schools and access to higher education.
These resources were developed as part of the ‘What works to reduce equality gaps for disabled students’ project. They include reports, intervention analysis reports and an Enhanced Theory of Change.
These resources were developed as part of a project exploring what works to reduce equality gaps for disabled students in higher education, including how to improve employability outcomes for students from underrepresented and disadvantaged backgrounds.
Access resources from our project where we appointed four higher education providers who provided institutional data, including student engagement with specific support interventions, for evaluation.
We have developed a data visualisation style guide for those who see the storytelling potential in data, offering guidance to enhance the impact of your information.
This guide helps higher education providers use their institutional data to identify equality gaps in student success and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce the gaps.
The Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (MEF) promotes an impact-driven evaluation approach, interlaced with process evaluation, to determine which interventions work in transforming access and student outcomes.
TASO is working with three higher education providers to participate in a project that will evaluate their student mental health and wellbeing interventions using quasi-experimental designs.
In this video the TASO team take questions from the audience around any issues or challenges they may be facing in their impact evaluation work and share some resources which can help them address some of these issues.
This rapid evidence review summarises 15 psychosocial intermediate outcomes. It outlines how the outcomes are measured and the extent to which they are associated with higher education access and success outcomes.
We often use surveys to measure student aspirations, intermediate outcomes and specific constructs of interest, sense of belonging for example. Likert scales are one of the most commonly used survey designs. Find out more about how to design Likert scales.
Economic evaluation is an approach that helps to assess cost-effectiveness – in this case, the cost effectiveness of interventions in higher education.
The Access and Success Questionnaire (ASQ) provides a set of validated survey scales that can be used by the higher education sector to evaluate its access and student success activities. The scales cover a selection of key intermediate outcomes which are commonly measured in evaluations of access and success interventions.
The post-entry MOAT (Mapping Outcomes and Activities Tool) is used to assist you in the planning and evaluation of activities designed to support student success.
The resources on this page will provide you with a consistent approach to coding outcomes and activities as you plan your widening participation outreach and evaluation.
The resources on this page will provide you with a consistent approach to coding outcomes and attainment-raising activities for your widening participation interventions.
The resources on this page will provide you with a consistent approach to coding outcomes and activities as you plan your widening participation outreach and evaluation.
Attainment raisingTransition into higher education
We have sought to find a range of examples of practice, addressing different interventions, target groups and being implemented by a range of higher education providers.
This page includes Enhanced Theories of Change from two higher education providers for activities aimed at supporting WP students in the access, and completion of, sandwich courses.
Assessing the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve student mental health is complex. This guide has been developed as part of the Student mental health project, lead by TASO and a consortium of partners
Mentoring, counselling, coachingSelf-advocacyMental health and wellbeing
Mentoring is often delivered as part of multi-intervention outreach programmes, but it can be difficult to evaluate. This report outlines analysis conducted on two online mentoring programmes.
Exploring the implementation of transition support and reasonable adjustments for disabled students, this report examines the experiences of disabled students and higher education provider staff.
Around one in six undergraduates now report experiencing mental health challenges, according to this analysis by The Policy Institute at King’s College London and TASO.
To help higher education providers learn about how to evaluate interventions with small sample sizes, this project involved testing evaluation approaches that are suitable for small cohorts.
Through analysis of the earnings and employment status of over a million people by education pathway, this report looks at the size of the equality gaps in labour market outcomes.
With an increasing need for more support for student mental health, this report provides insights from those involved in the delivery and evaluation of current student mental health interventions.
Sandwich courses can help reduce equality gaps, but disadvantaged students are less likely to enrol in them – this research maps out barriers and solutions for students participating in sandwich courses.
This report sets out recommendations and two new resources which will help higher education providers develop and use their institutional data more effectively when evaluating student success.
A project to help the higher education sector use institutional data to generate evidence about which initiatives are effective in supporting student success and reducing equality gaps.
To better understand the various benefits of higher education, this project examined the link between educational qualifications and earnings and employment, in particular for disadvantaged young people.
Find out more about our blueprint for multi-intervention transition support. The blueprint provides a set of evidence-informed activities and programmes to enhance disabled students’ transition into higher education.
By mapping the kinds of transition support and reasonable adjustments used in higher education, this project increased understanding of the existing evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions
In 2023-24, we commissioned Staffordshire University and Advance HE to produce theories of change and evaluation plans for interventions designed to address the ethnicity degree awarding gap.
In 2023-24, we commissioned Staffordshire University and Advance HE to produce theories of change and evaluation plans for interventions designed to address the ethnicity degree awarding gap.
The report provides key recommendations and insights to support the sector in developing theories of change for interventions that aim to address the ethnicity degree awarding gap.
Learning analytics can identify students at risk of withdrawing from their studies and prompt support interventions. This report details two randomised controlled trials of these types of interventions.
Higher education providers face challenges when evaluating interventions that have small sample sizes. This project involved the piloting of evaluation methodologies that are suitable for small cohorts.
This report sets out interim findings of a randomised controlled trial on the impact of summer schools in getting students from disadvantaged and under-represented groups to participate in higher education.
A project exploring what works reduce equality gaps for disabled students in higher education, and how to improve employment and employability outcomes.
To explore the effectiveness of using less commonly used evaluation methods to generate evidence, this report sets out the results of evaluations undertaken by four higher education providers.
This report analyses data to examine how the wellbeing of undergraduate and taught postgraduate students has changed over time, and how it varies according to demographic characteristics and circumstances.
The higher education sector has committed to tackling the ethnicity degree awarding gap; this report sets out findings from research on the different approaches being undertaken to reduce the gap.
Partnering with three higher education providers, this report explores the impact of multi-intervention outreach and mentoring programmes, and the different ways these programmes can be evaluated.
This report explores the evidence on the value of higher education, and specifically the individual and societal impacts of disadvantaged young people graduating from higher education courses.
To help higher education providers do more to raise the academic attainment of school students, this project involved the development of six theories of change for pre-16 attainment-raising initiatives.
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of online teaching and learning in higher education. This research explored the impact of this on student outcomes, focusing on disadvantaged students.
This report sets out the results of a data analysis project to investigate the effect of teaching and learning changes during the COVID-19 pandemic on outcomes for disadvantaged students.
A summary of an evidence review by the University of Lincoln, this report outlines the evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to address inequalities in higher education among disabled students.
Interventions that are prompted by data from university infrastructure systems are believed to be effective in improving engagement. This project aims to build a strong evidence base for these interventions.
A report summarising the evaluation of two curriculum reform interventions that aimed to narrow the degree awarding gap between Black, Asian and minority ethnic students and their white peers.
This rapid evidence review summarises 15 psychosocial intermediate outcomes, how they are measured, and the extent to which they are associated with higher education access and success outcomes.
This report shares interim findings of TASO’s evaluation of online summer schools taking place between June and August 2021 – the first of two randomised controlled trials of higher education summer schools.
This report is a review of the evidence on interventions and activities carried out by higher education providers to raise the attainment of school-age students.
It can be challenging to generate effective evidence for widening participation interventions in higher education. This guidance looks at impact evaluation strategies which can be used with small cohorts.
This report explores the factors affecting student mental health in higher education and provides an analysis of the interventions used to support them.
This project explored how education providers can improve labour market outcomes for graduates from disadvantaged groups and address gaps in the participation in sandwich courses.
To better understand the various benefits of higher education, this research examined the individual and societal impacts of disadvantaged young people graduating from higher education courses.
This project aims to help higher education providers support their disabled students more effectively and address inequalities in their experience of higher education.
Some student groups are more likely to experience poor mental health than others. We examined which measures are most effective at improving student mental health in higher education.
A report of a review undertaken to understand evidence around supporting higher education access and student success for mature learners, and a survey experiment on which institutional features are attractive to mature learners.
An analysis of the Higher Education Access Tracking (HEAT) Service’s dataset on the relationship between Key Stage 4 attainment and higher education progression.
Students who attend a university summer school may have a more positive attitude towards higher education as a result. This project looks at the link between summer schools and access to higher education.
Outreach and mentoring programmes combining two or more student support activities are associated with positive attitudes towards higher education. This project aims to provide causal evidence of this.
The COVID-19 pandemic prompted a rapid transition to online teaching in higher education. This project explored the impact of this on student outcomes, particularly for disadvantaged students.
A report summarising the findings from research assessing the evidence base on activities designed to support access and success in post-secondary education for learners with experience of children’s social care.
A report on research undertaken by the Education Policy Institute on interventions aimed at widening access to higher education for the most disadvantaged students.